Posts

JUDGEMENT OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN THE CASE TITLED “SHEHZADA KHALID VS. STATE (NCT OF DELHI), (2020) 06 DEL CK 0068” CONCERNING OFFENCES UNDER PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT

Image
          NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Shehzada Khalid vs. State (Nct Of Delhi), (2020) 06 DEL CK 0068 PARA NO. 73 73. The learned Solicitor General has submitted that depending upon the facts of each case, it is for the investigating agency to confront the accused with the material, only when the accused is in custody. It was submitted that the statutory right under Section 19 of PMLA has an in-built safeguard against arbitrary exercise of power of arrest by the investigating officer. Submitting that custodial interrogation is a recognised mode of interrogation which is not only permissible but has been held to be more effective, the learned Solicitor G...